← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Brooks Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1991-07-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 NAHL 45 1 11 12 0.267 0.0947 0.0990 0.2800 0.2928
2010-11 Janesville Jets NAHL 58 10 24 34 0.586 0.2082 0.2071 0.6155 0.6124
2011-12 NAHL 56 6 19 25 0.446 0.1586 0.1500 0.4687 0.4432
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen SR 31 7 23 30 0.968
2014-15 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen JR 31 5 21 26 0.839
2013-14 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen SO 28 2 17 19 0.679
2012-13 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 FR 27 3 10 13 0.481
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2012-13 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+195.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8102
Defenseman overall
#1080
Defenseman born in 1991
#2911
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aurora · 2017-18
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2008-09
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.