| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | — | NAHL | 45 | 1 | 11 | 12 | 0.267 | 0.0947 | 0.0990 | 0.2800 | 0.2928 |
| 2010-11 | Janesville Jets | NAHL | 58 | 10 | 24 | 34 | 0.586 | 0.2082 | 0.2071 | 0.6155 | 0.6124 |
| 2011-12 | — | NAHL | 56 | 6 | 19 | 25 | 0.446 | 0.1586 | 0.1500 | 0.4687 | 0.4432 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 | Wisconsin-Stevens Point | D3 | BigTen | SR | 31 | 7 | 23 | 30 | 0.968 |
| 2014-15 | Wisconsin-Stevens Point | D3 | BigTen | JR | 31 | 5 | 21 | 26 | 0.839 |
| 2013-14 | Wisconsin-Stevens Point | D3 | BigTen | SO | 28 | 2 | 17 | 19 | 0.679 |
| 2012-13 | Wisconsin-Stevens Point | D3 | — | FR | 27 | 3 | 10 | 13 | 0.481 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.