IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Fredrik Olofsson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-05-27 Country: Sweden
2014 · Round 4, Pick #98  ·  Chicago Blackhawks Chicago Blackhawks
Signed Professionally
Rögle BK · SHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 8 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2013-14 — USHL 52 6 15 21 0.404 0.2382 0.2511 1.2128 1.2785
2014-15 Chicago Steel USHL 57 27 33 60 1.053 0.6209 0.6240 3.1614 3.1772
2019-20 MoDo Hockey Allsvenskan 52 10 24 34 0.654 1.6345 1.6345 6.1339 6.1339
2020-21 IK Oskarshamn SHL 51 13 21 34 0.667 1.6667 1.6667 8.6995 8.6995
2021-22 IK Oskarshamn SHL 49 15 27 42 0.857 2.1427 2.2630 11.1840 11.8120
2025-26 Rögle BK SHL 52 12 26 38 0.731 1.8270 1.8270 9.5359 9.5359
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC SR 36 10 24 34 0.944
2017-18 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC JR 33 6 14 20 0.606
2016-17 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC SO 34 11 13 24 0.706
2015-16 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC FR 34 8 9 17 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.41
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2015-16 · Nebraska Omaha
+23.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#146
Forward overall
#12
Forward born in 1996

D2/3 Comparables

Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Filimon Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.