IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Lough Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-04-23 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 4 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2011-12 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 60 18 17 35 0.583 0.2247 0.2287 0.8489 0.8639
2012-13 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 49 22 33 55 1.122 0.4325 0.4197 1.6334 1.5850
2013-14 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 60 19 23 42 0.700 0.4129 0.3714 2.1024 1.8910
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC SR 37 6 8 14 0.378
2016-17 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC JR 37 4 8 12 0.324
2015-16 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC SO 32 3 11 14 0.438
2014-15 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC FR 36 3 5 8 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2014-15 · St. Lawrence
-33.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10407
Forward overall
#396
Forward born in 1993

D1 Comparables

Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Taylor McCloy
Adrian · 2013-14
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Austin Master
Stevenson · 2018-19
1.148 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Rick Cleaver
Norwich · 2003-04
1.235 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.