IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Charlie Curti Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-05-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 60 4 19 23 0.383 0.2261 0.2269 1.1502 1.1544
2014-15 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 53 5 19 24 0.453 0.2671 0.2549 1.3587 1.2968
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Yale D1 ECAC SR 30 3 5 8 0.267
2017-18 Yale D1 ECAC JR 25 3 8 11 0.440
2016-17 Yale D1 ECAC SO 32 2 12 14 0.438
2015-16 Yale D1 ECAC FR 23 1 3 4 0.174
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2015-16 · Yale
-24.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#4292
Defenseman overall
#766
Defenseman born in 1995
#2159
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Christopher Dienes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Tucker Poolman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jared Kolquist
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Niklas Nevalainen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Victor Björkung
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Pier-Olivier Cotnoir
Norwich · 2008-09
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Perkins
Finlandia · 2018-19
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Blasko
Nazareth · 2011-12
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.