← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dillon Eichstadt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-02-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 NAHL 35 2 8 10 0.286 0.1050 0.1076 0.3016 0.3090
2013-14 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 51 4 31 35 0.686 0.2521 0.2457 1.0010 0.9401
2014-15 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 54 7 19 26 0.481 0.2840 0.2528 1.4461 1.2870
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Bemidji State D1 WCHA SR 36 3 11 14 0.389
2017-18 Bemidji State D1 WCHA JR 36 2 5 7 0.194
2016-17 Bemidji State D1 WCHA SO 24 1 1 2 0.083
2015-16 Bemidji State D1 WCHA FR 38 0 9 9 0.237
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2015-16 · Bemidji State
0.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#4618
Defenseman overall
#837
Defenseman born in 1994

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alvernia · 2021-22
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2013-14
1.320 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2010-11
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.