IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mitchel Slattery Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-04-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Indiana Ice USHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2014-15 — USHL 47 6 5 11 0.234 0.1380 0.1380 0.7028 0.7027
2015-16 — NAHL 38 6 20 26 0.684 0.2514 0.2483 0.7222 0.7133
2016-17 Minnesota Magicians NAHL 54 20 39 59 1.093 0.4014 0.3747 1.1532 1.0764
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA — 36 4 4 8 0.222
2018-19 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA — 33 3 1 4 0.121
2017-18 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA — 40 4 4 8 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2017-18 · Northern Michigan
-27.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14345
Forward overall
#573
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cole Stewart
Southern New Hampshire · 2017-18
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryan Black
SUNY Potsdam · 2008-09
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nate Rein
Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
0.967 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.