IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Christopher Brown Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-02-22 Country: USA
2014 · Round 5, Pick #151  ·  Buffalo Sabres Buffalo Sabres
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2014-15 — USHL 58 13 24 37 0.638 0.3763 0.3733 1.9159 1.9006
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Boston College D1 HockeyEast — 39 7 9 16 0.410
2017-18 Boston College D1 HockeyEast — 37 9 10 19 0.513
2016-17 Boston College D1 HockeyEast — 34 9 17 26 0.765
2015-16 Boston College D1 HockeyEast — 41 2 9 11 0.268
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2015-16 · Boston College
-16.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9638
Forward overall
#400
Forward born in 1996
#804
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Jared Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cam Darcy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jake Randolph
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Willem Nong-Lambert
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Christian Heil
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Donny Flynn
Wilkes · 2015-16
1.423 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Woodward
SUNY Oswego · 2000-01
1.226 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Gus Katsuras
Hamilton · 2000-01
1.400 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.