IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gordie Green Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-02-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 — USHL 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2014-15 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 56 9 12 21 0.375 0.2305 0.2403 1.1048 1.1516
2015-16 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 60 12 27 39 0.650 0.3996 0.3980 1.9150 1.9072
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Miami D1 NCHC SR 34 14 22 36 1.059
2018-19 Miami D1 NCHC JR 38 11 14 25 0.658
2017-18 Miami D1 NCHC SO 37 15 18 33 0.892
2016-17 Miami D1 NCHC FR 36 8 13 21 0.583
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2016-17 · Miami
+103.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13096
Forward overall
#585
Forward born in 1997
#1293
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Cam Darcy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jake Randolph
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Willem Nong-Lambert
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Daniel Milne
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Michigan
0.41 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Donny Flynn
Wilkes · 2015-16
1.423 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Woodward
SUNY Oswego · 2000-01
1.226 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Gus Katsuras
Hamilton · 2000-01
1.400 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.