IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Wyatt Ege Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-03-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 59 3 17 20 0.339 0.1245 0.1282 0.3578 0.3685
2014-15 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 59 3 21 24 0.407 0.2400 0.2269 1.2218 1.1552
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Ohio State D1 BigTen SR 35 4 8 12 0.343
2018-19 Ohio State D1 BigTen JR 36 2 9 11 0.306
2017-18 Ohio State D1 BigTen SO 40 0 18 18 0.450
2015-16 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA FR 34 4 9 13 0.382
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2015-16 · Alaska Anchorage
+116.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6674
Defenseman overall
#1087
Defenseman born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Victor Björkung
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Fleming
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Vinny Muto
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Connor Murphy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Cornell (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Max Everson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Eric Bolden
Elmira · 2015-16
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Payden Benning
Curry · 2007-08
1.074 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Imala
Fitchburg State · 2022-23
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.