IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

James Winkler Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-04-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 52 15 2 17 0.327 0.1928 0.1928 0.9631 0.9633
2015-16 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 49 11 10 21 0.429 0.2528 0.2411 1.2627 1.2043
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Endicott D1 — SR 26 20 15 35 1.346
2019-20 Endicott D3 CNE SR 26 20 15 35 1.346
2018-19 Endicott D1 — JR 27 11 9 20 0.741
2018-19 Endicott D3 CNE JR 27 11 9 20 0.741
2017-18 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast SO 5 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast FR 6 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#22681
Forward overall
#905
Forward born in 1996
#2242
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Janssen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Devin Loe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Miami (0.71 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Luc Gerdes
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Josh Maucieri
St. Thomas · 2018-19
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Marlon Gardner
Neumann · 2006-07
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Fuss
New England · 2017-18
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.