IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Pohlkamp Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-07-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 59 2 14 16 0.271 0.1600 0.1537 0.8145 0.7822
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Bowling Green D1 WCHA SR 41 0 11 11 0.268
2017-18 Bowling Green D1 WCHA JR 26 1 8 9 0.346
2016-17 Bowling Green D1 WCHA SO 37 0 10 10 0.270
2015-16 Bowling Green D1 WCHA FR 41 1 5 6 0.146
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2015-16 · Bowling Green
0.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9250
Defenseman overall
#1383
Defenseman born in 1995
#3110
in USHL

D1 Comparables

James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Tucker Poolman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nate Rein
Wisconsin-Superior · 2003-04
0.967 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Mania
UMass Dartmouth · 2018-19
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Colton Alexander
Canton · 2023-24
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.