IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Graham McPhee Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-07-24 Country: USA
2016 · Round 5, Pick #149  ·  Edmonton Oilers Edmonton Oilers
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 43 4 15 19 0.442 0.3285 0.3395 1.6489 1.7039
2015-16 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 58 10 8 18 0.310 0.2306 0.2275 1.1579 1.1422
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Boston College D1 HockeyEast — 34 5 7 12 0.353
2018-19 Boston College D1 HockeyEast — 29 3 6 9 0.310
2017-18 Boston College D1 HockeyEast — 36 12 12 24 0.667
2016-17 Boston College D1 HockeyEast — 39 2 8 10 0.256
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2016-17 · Boston College
+10.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#28332
Forward overall
#1384
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Brandon Salerno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Moy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Harvard (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jack Jenkins
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Hudson Fasching
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.75 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Joel L'Esperance
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Luke Moodie
SUNY Oswego · 2005-06
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brent Wold
Utica · 2010-11
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Alexei Filimonov
Fitchburg State · 2021-22
1.560 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.