← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Jenkins Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-07-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 62 5 21 26 0.419 0.2578 0.2725 1.2356 1.3060
2013-14 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 59 8 15 23 0.390 0.2396 0.2420 1.1484 1.1601
2014-15 USHL 53 14 21 35 0.660 0.4059 0.3901 1.9457 1.8699
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Notre Dame D1 BigTen SR 40 3 10 13 0.325
2017-18 Notre Dame D1 BigTen 40 3 10 13 0.325
2017-18 Suffolk D3 SR 25 3 0 3 0.120
2016-17 Notre Dame D1 36 7 5 12 0.333
2016-17 Suffolk D3 JR 25 3 5 8 0.320
2015-16 Notre Dame D1 28 2 2 4 0.143
2015-16 Suffolk D3 SO 22 3 3 6 0.273
2014-15 Suffolk D3 FR 26 3 6 9 0.346
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2014-15 · Suffolk
+59.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13948
Forward overall
#558
Forward born in 1995
#1385
in USHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ RPI (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Vermont (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Wisconsin-Stout (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hamilton · 2000-01
1.400 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2000-01
1.226 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2009-10
1.258 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.