| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | North York Rangers | OJHL | 46 | 8 | 17 | 25 | 0.543 | 0.1519 | 0.1709 | 0.3751 | 0.4221 |
| 2012-13 | Waterloo Black Hawks | USHL | 59 | 6 | 15 | 21 | 0.356 | 0.2266 | 0.2401 | 1.0665 | 1.1302 |
| 2013-14 | Waterloo Black Hawks | USHL | 35 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 0.171 | 0.1091 | 0.1105 | 0.5136 | 0.5203 |
| 2014-15 | Pickering Panthers | OJHL | 49 | 30 | 39 | 69 | 1.408 | 0.3935 | 0.3828 | 0.9718 | 0.9454 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Alabama-Huntsville | D1 | — | SR | 32 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 0.156 |
| 2018-19 | Alabama-Huntsville | D1 | — | JR | 38 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 0.210 |
| 2017-18 | Alabama-Huntsville | D1 | — | SO | 31 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 0.258 |
| 2016-17 | Alabama-Huntsville | D1 | — | FR | 20 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 0.300 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.