← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon Salerno Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-07-31 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 North York Rangers OJHL 46 8 17 25 0.543 0.1332 0.1499 0.3742 0.4211
2012-13 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 59 6 15 21 0.356 0.2099 0.2224 1.0689 1.1327
2013-14 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 35 3 3 6 0.171 0.1011 0.1024 0.5148 0.5215
2014-15 Pickering Panthers OJHL 49 30 39 69 1.408 0.3451 0.3357 0.9695 0.9431
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Alabama Huntsville D1 SR 32 3 2 5 0.156
2019-20 Alabama-Huntsville D1 SR 32 3 2 5 0.156
2018-19 Alabama Huntsville D1 JR 38 5 3 8 0.210
2018-19 Alabama-Huntsville D1 JR 38 5 3 8 0.210
2017-18 Alabama-Huntsville D1 SO 31 2 6 8 0.258
2016-17 Alabama-Huntsville D1 FR 20 3 3 6 0.300
2015-16 Alabama-Huntsville D1 0 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#18563
Forward overall
#707
Forward born in 1995
#671
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Army (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Vermont (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Geneseo · 2000-01
1.042 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Michael's College · 2002-03
1.280 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.