← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon Salerno Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-07-31 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 North York Rangers OJHL 46 8 17 25 0.543 0.1519 0.1709 0.3751 0.4221
2012-13 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 59 6 15 21 0.356 0.2266 0.2401 1.0665 1.1302
2013-14 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 35 3 3 6 0.171 0.1091 0.1105 0.5136 0.5203
2014-15 Pickering Panthers OJHL 49 30 39 69 1.408 0.3935 0.3828 0.9718 0.9454
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Alabama-Huntsville D1 SR 32 3 2 5 0.156
2018-19 Alabama-Huntsville D1 JR 38 5 3 8 0.210
2017-18 Alabama-Huntsville D1 SO 31 2 6 8 0.258
2016-17 Alabama-Huntsville D1 FR 20 3 3 6 0.300
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2016-17 · Alabama-Huntsville
+28.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13227
Forward overall
#465
Forward born in 1995
#743
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Vermont (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Geneseo · 2000-01
1.042 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Michael's · 2002-03
1.280 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.