IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kris Heeres Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1981-09-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 — BCHL 62 19 37 56 0.903 0.3515 0.3453 1.3171 1.2939
2001-02 Merritt Centennials BCHL 59 20 40 60 1.017 0.3958 0.3670 1.4829 1.3750
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2005-06 SUNY Geneseo D3 — SR 30 11 6 17 0.567
2004-05 SUNY Geneseo D3 — JR 16 1 2 3 0.188
2003-04 SUNY Geneseo D3 — SO 21 3 7 10 0.476
2002-03 SUNY Geneseo D3 — FR 24 11 14 25 1.042
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.04
2002-03 · SUNY Geneseo
+239.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6237
Forward overall
#264
Forward born in 1981
#370
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Beau Walker
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joel Covelli
Colby · 2004-05
1.042 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitch Stephens
SUNY Geneseo · 2002-03
1.077 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Libonati
Becker · 2006-07
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.