← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luc Lalor Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-09-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 48 8 22 30 0.625 0.2096 0.2282 0.5784 0.6297
2013-14 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 8 4 5 9 1.125 0.3773 0.3912 1.0411 1.0794
2014-15 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 13 0 3 3 0.231 0.1361 0.1318 0.6932 0.6711
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Cornell D1 ECAC SO 3 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Cornell D1 ECAC FR 3 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#30473
Forward overall
#1202
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Brockport · 2018-19
1.074 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2010-11
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Finlandia · 2009-10
0.786 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.