IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Galloway Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-09-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 40 10 15 25 0.625 0.1444 0.1468 0.3058 0.3109
2019-20 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 35 13 25 38 1.086 0.2508 0.2508 0.5312 0.5312
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC JR 24 7 11 18 0.750
2022-23 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC SO 23 12 16 28 1.217
2021-22 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC FR 27 11 18 29 1.074
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.07
2021-22 · SUNY Brockport
+754.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
30%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14979
Forward overall
#702
Forward born in 1999
#227
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alex Walker
UMass Dartmouth · 2023-24
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Greg Diamond
SUNY Geneseo · 2023-24
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Zach Hill
Finlandia · 2012-13
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.