IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Greg Diamond Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-09-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Mercer Chiefs NCDC 18 1 1 2 0.111 0.0313 0.0334 0.1882 0.1985
2023-24 Mercer Chiefs NCDC 43 11 15 26 0.605 0.1704 0.1720 0.4896 0.4942
2024-25 Mercer Chiefs NCDC 51 22 27 49 0.961 0.2708 0.2613 0.7779 0.7507
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Geneseo D3 — FR 27 4 10 14 0.518
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2025-26 · SUNY Geneseo
+168.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22255
Forward overall
#1093
Forward born in 2004
#306
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Beau Walker
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cayden Cahill
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2016-17
0.862 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Blake Kashark
UMass Dartmouth · 2023-24
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Gavin Simopoulos
Southern Maine · 2023-24
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.