IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Filips Buncis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-06-12 Country: Latvia
Signed Professionally
Västerviks IK · Allsvenskan

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 10 1 0 1 0.100 0.0590 0.0624 0.3003 0.3175
2015-16 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 51 10 14 24 0.471 0.1729 0.1807 0.4967 0.5190
2016-17 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 46 11 25 36 0.783 0.2875 0.2848 0.8260 0.8182
2020-21 Krefeld Pinguine DEL 38 3 3 6 0.158 0.3948 0.3948 1.3387 1.3387
2021-22 Dinamo Riga KHL 37 1 2 3 0.081 0.2028 0.2301 1.1175 1.2677
2023-24 Västerviks IK Allsvenskan 52 9 8 17 0.327 0.8173 0.7866 3.0669 2.9519
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Arizona State D1 NCHC SR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Arizona State D1 NCHC JR 32 4 8 12 0.375
2018-19 Arizona State D1 NCHC SO 33 5 5 10 0.303
2017-18 Arizona State D1 NCHC FR 22 1 0 1 0.045
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.05
2017-18 · Arizona State
-78.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

⭐ Elite profile — high probability of D1 placement; comparable to top-end prospects
10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6435
Forward overall
#306
Forward born in 1997

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Ellis
SUNY Oswego · 2004-05
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Gus Katsuras
Hamilton · 2001-02
1.400 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Conor Landrigan
Utica · 2016-17
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.