IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Finnegan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-05-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 4 0 1 1 0.250 0.1475 0.1552 0.7502 0.7895
2015-16 — BCHL 53 9 18 27 0.509 0.1963 0.2014 0.7409 0.7602
2016-17 Jersey Hitmen USPHL-Premier-Classic 26 7 13 20 0.769 0.2159 0.2173 0.6324 0.6366
2017-18 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 47 17 27 44 0.936 0.3817 0.3599 0.7491 0.7064
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Lindenwood D1 CCHA — 29 6 14 20 0.690
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.69
2022-23 · Lindenwood
+166.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13351
Forward overall
#608
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jackson Krill
Williams · 2024-25
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Hunter Hayes
St. Olaf · 2024-25
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Iacullo
Saint Anselm · 2017-18
0.655 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.