IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brendan Harris Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-07-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 — NAHL 53 7 18 25 0.472 0.1733 0.1898 0.4979 0.5454
2014-15 Wenatchee Wild NAHL 50 16 28 44 0.880 0.3233 0.3372 — —
2015-16 Wenatchee Wild BCHL 57 14 42 56 0.983 0.3786 0.3728 1.4298 1.4079
2016-17 Wenatchee Wild BCHL 57 23 75 98 1.719 0.6624 0.6184 2.5021 2.3359
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Bemidji State D1 WCHA SR 29 9 14 23 0.793
2019-20 Bemidji State D1 WCHA JR 11 0 4 4 0.364
2018-19 Bemidji State D1 WCHA SO 31 4 14 18 0.581
2017-18 Bemidji State D1 WCHA FR 33 4 7 11 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.48
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2017-18 · Bemidji State
-31.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6083
Forward overall
#293
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Mike Szmatula
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.21 PPG
→ Northeastern (1.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Michael Huntebrinker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.48 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eric Scheid
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Novak
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Donny Flynn
Wilkes · 2016-17
1.423 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Yuel
Curry · 2006-07
1.769 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Kalinowski
Endicott · 2015-16
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.