← New Search ↗ Social Card

Troy Conzo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-02-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 New Jersey Rockets EHL 40 22 22 44 1.100 0.2541 0.2874 0.5382 0.6088
2014-15 Wenatchee Wild NAHL 44 4 5 9 0.204 0.0751 0.0807
2015-16 Wenatchee Wild BCHL 55 13 21 34 0.618 0.2382 0.2419 0.8997 0.9138
2016-17 Wenatchee Wild BCHL 55 19 49 68 1.236 0.4764 0.4595 1.7993 1.7354
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Sacred Heart D1 AHA 33 3 7 10 0.303
2020-21 Colorado College D1 NCHC 22 2 3 5 0.227
2019-20 Colorado College D1 NCHC 23 3 6 9 0.391
2018-19 Colorado College D1 NCHC 34 7 8 15 0.441
2017-18 Colorado College D1 NCHC 35 5 9 14 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2017-18 · Colorado College
+25.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15958
Forward overall
#711
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Union (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Marian · 2010-11
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2015-16
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2012-13
1.296 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.