← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cole Gallant Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-03-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Fargo Force USHL 4 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2015-16 Fargo Force USHL 52 3 7 10 0.192 0.1134 0.1189 0.5770 0.6049
2016-17 — USHL 55 15 6 21 0.382 0.2252 0.2246 1.1457 1.1426
2017-18 Omaha Lancers USHL 59 15 37 52 0.881 0.5199 0.4927 2.6448 2.5064
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Western Michigan D1 NCHC GR 39 6 18 24 0.615
2021-22 Western Michigan D1 NCHC SR 39 9 17 26 0.667
2020-21 Western Michigan D1 NCHC JR 25 5 13 18 0.720
2019-20 Western Michigan D1 NCHC SO 31 4 16 20 0.645
2018-19 Western Michigan D1 NCHC FR 26 3 7 10 0.385
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2018-19 · Western Michigan
+16.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

95%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12486
Forward overall
#565
Forward born in 1998
#1294
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Union (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.90 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Miami (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Fitchburg State · 2016-17
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2013-14
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2023-24
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.