| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-15 | Fargo Force | USHL | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2015-16 | Fargo Force | USHL | 52 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 0.192 | 0.1134 | 0.1189 | 0.5770 | 0.6049 |
| 2016-17 | — | USHL | 55 | 15 | 6 | 21 | 0.382 | 0.2252 | 0.2246 | 1.1457 | 1.1426 |
| 2017-18 | Omaha Lancers | USHL | 59 | 15 | 37 | 52 | 0.881 | 0.5199 | 0.4927 | 2.6448 | 2.5064 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-23 | Western Michigan | D1 | NCHC | GR | 39 | 6 | 18 | 24 | 0.615 |
| 2021-22 | Western Michigan | D1 | NCHC | SR | 39 | 9 | 17 | 26 | 0.667 |
| 2020-21 | Western Michigan | D1 | NCHC | JR | 25 | 5 | 13 | 18 | 0.720 |
| 2019-20 | Western Michigan | D1 | NCHC | SO | 31 | 4 | 16 | 20 | 0.645 |
| 2018-19 | Western Michigan | D1 | NCHC | FR | 26 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 0.385 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.