← New Search ↗ Social Card

Yevgen Fadyeyev Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-10-08 Country: Ukraine
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Madison Capitols USHL 5 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Madison Capitols USHL 28 5 5 10 0.357 0.2107 0.2164 1.0725 1.1013
2016-17 Madison Capitols USHL 56 6 23 29 0.518 0.3055 0.2981 1.5555 1.5178
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Ohio State D1 BigTen 21 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Ohio State D1 BigTen 32 0 5 5 0.156
2018-19 Ohio State D1 BigTen 17 1 0 1 0.059
2017-18 Ohio State D1 BigTen 5 1 0 1 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2017-18 · Ohio State
-12.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18289
Forward overall
#810
Forward born in 1997
#1782
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Dartmouth (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Army (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Dartmouth · 2021-22
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
University of New England · 2012-13
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.