IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Christiano Versich Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-01-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 St. Thomas Academy USHS-MN 24 21 37 58 2.417 0.3060 0.2880 0.5870 0.5525
2015-16 Chicago Steel USHL 56 10 19 29 0.518 0.3055 0.3020 1.5555 1.5379
2016-17 — USHL 61 7 27 34 0.557 0.3288 0.3083 1.6741 1.5697
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 St. Thomas D1 CCHA — 31 5 11 16 0.516
2019-20 Colorado College D1 NCHC — 29 3 4 7 0.241
2018-19 Colorado College D1 NCHC — 40 5 12 17 0.425
2017-18 Colorado College D1 NCHC — 37 5 16 21 0.568
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.57
2017-18 · Colorado College
+116.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9014
Forward overall
#416
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Coby Downs
Norwich · 2016-17
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Scott Hudson
Manhattanville · 2007-08
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jonny Mulera
Salve Regina · 2018-19
1.409 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.