← New Search ↗ Social Card

Logan Drevitch Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-04-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Boston Jr. Bandits EHL 6 2 2 4 0.667 0.1540 0.1758 0.3262 0.3724
2015-16 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 55 3 12 15 0.273 0.1609 0.1694 0.8190 0.8620
2016-17 USHL 57 13 10 23 0.404 0.2380 0.2384 1.2119 1.2138
2017-18 Boston Jr. Bandits NCDC 42 21 34 55 1.310 0.5339 0.5284 1.0526 1.0418
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast SR 35 5 8 13 0.371
2020-21 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast JR 12 3 6 9 0.750
2019-20 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast SO 34 7 11 18 0.529
2018-19 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast FR 33 4 5 9 0.273
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.35
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2018-19 · Merrimack
-22.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
35%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6258
Forward overall
#290
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.90 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Miami (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Union (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2006-07
1.778 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2022-23
0.759 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.