| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-15 | Boston Jr. Bandits | EHL | 6 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0.667 | 0.1540 | 0.1758 | 0.3262 | 0.3724 |
| 2015-16 | Muskegon Lumberjacks | USHL | 55 | 3 | 12 | 15 | 0.273 | 0.1609 | 0.1694 | 0.8190 | 0.8620 |
| 2016-17 | — | USHL | 57 | 13 | 10 | 23 | 0.404 | 0.2380 | 0.2384 | 1.2119 | 1.2138 |
| 2017-18 | Boston Jr. Bandits | NCDC | 42 | 21 | 34 | 55 | 1.310 | 0.5339 | 0.5284 | 1.0526 | 1.0418 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | Merrimack | D1 | HockeyEast | SR | 35 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 0.371 |
| 2020-21 | Merrimack | D1 | HockeyEast | JR | 12 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 0.750 |
| 2019-20 | Merrimack | D1 | HockeyEast | SO | 34 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 0.529 |
| 2018-19 | Merrimack | D1 | HockeyEast | FR | 33 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 0.273 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.