IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

William Fällström Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-02-03 Country: Sweden
Signed Professionally
HC Vita Hästen · Allsvenskan

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Djurgårdens IF U20 SuperElit 36 3 15 18 0.500 0.1973 0.2138 0.6791 0.7358
2015-16 Omaha Lancers USHL 44 5 8 13 0.295 0.1743 0.1818 0.8875 0.9257
2016-17 Djurgårdens IF U20 SHL-J20 19 2 10 12 0.632 0.3510 0.3446 0.8415 0.8262
2017-18 Fargo Force USHL 58 14 31 45 0.776 0.4577 0.4313 2.3303 2.1959
2020-21 — Allsvenskan 47 7 8 15 0.319 0.7977 0.7977 2.9938 2.9938
2021-22 HC Vita Hästen Allsvenskan 15 0 1 1 0.067 0.1667 0.1797 0.6258 0.6746
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC SO 33 1 16 17 0.515
2018-19 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC FR 38 8 13 21 0.553
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.34
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.55
2018-19 · Quinnipiac
+62.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7707
Forward overall
#346
Forward born in 1998

D2/3 Comparables

Luke Simpson
St. Scholastica · 2017-18
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan McDonald
Framingham State · 2011-12
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan Calder
Salve Regina · 2021-22
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.