← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Brushett Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-06-14 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 USHL 47 2 8 10 0.213 0.1255 0.1331 0.6391 0.6780
2016-17 Vernon Vipers BCHL 50 10 16 26 0.520 0.2004 0.2064 0.7568 0.7794
2017-18 Surrey Eagles BCHL 58 21 28 49 0.845 0.3255 0.3196 1.2294 1.2071
2018-19 Powell River Kings BCHL 55 41 43 84 1.527 0.5885 0.5461 2.2227 2.0625
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 RPI D1 ECAC 37 6 15 21 0.568
2022-23 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast 24 1 9 10 0.417
2021-22 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast 35 8 14 22 0.629
2020-21 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC SO 18 1 6 7 0.389
2019-20 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC FR 36 2 16 18 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.39
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2019-20 · Nebraska Omaha
+28.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9135
Forward overall
#403
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.48 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2013-14
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2006-07
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2017-18
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.