IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cody Fleckenstein Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-03-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Omaha Lancers USHL 26 2 2 4 0.154 0.0907 0.0908 0.4619 0.4622
2016-17 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 58 13 19 32 0.552 0.2027 0.1988 0.5823 0.5710
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Army D1 AHA SR 16 0 1 1 0.062
2019-20 Army D1 AHA JR 33 1 6 7 0.212
2018-19 Army D1 AHA SO 22 0 1 1 0.045
2017-18 Army D1 AHA FR 3 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#9010
Defenseman overall
#1571
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Victor Björkung
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Vinny Muto
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Max Everson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jared Kolquist
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joshua McCully
Westfield State · 2008-09
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Murphy
Babson · 2021-22
0.786 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Thomas Sumi
Elmira · 2011-12
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.