IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Del Gaizo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-01-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 40 2 2 4 0.100 0.0590 0.0615 0.3001 0.3129
2016-17 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 57 11 13 24 0.421 0.2484 0.2463 1.2636 1.2529
2017-18 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 60 40 32 72 1.200 0.7079 0.6668 3.6008 3.3916
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 UMass D1 HockeyEast — 36 7 10 17 0.472
2020-21 UMass D1 HockeyEast — 28 2 3 5 0.179
2019-20 UMass D1 HockeyEast — 31 2 6 8 0.258
2018-19 UMass D1 HockeyEast — 37 6 4 10 0.270
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.43
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2018-19 · UMass
-36.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

92%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8052
Forward overall
#365
Forward born in 1998
#715
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Michael Vecchione
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Union (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Novak
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Luc Gerdes
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sam Anas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Elite
NCAAe PPG
J.T. Stenglein
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Michigan (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.59 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.