IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Croix Evingson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-08-28 Country: USA
2017 · Round 7, Pick #211  ·  Winnipeg Jets Winnipeg Jets
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Chicago Steel USHL 16 1 0 1 0.062 0.0369 0.0377 0.1877 0.1917
2016-17 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 59 12 40 52 0.881 0.3238 0.3242 0.9303 0.9313
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Niagara D1 AHA JR 21 1 11 12 0.571
2018-19 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast SO 16 0 2 2 0.125
2017-18 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast FR 16 1 5 6 0.375
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2017-18 · UMass Lowell
+89.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7942
Defenseman overall
#1441
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Mike McKee
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Murray
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Hamline (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Niklas Nevalainen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Tucker Poolman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joona Juntunen
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2022-23
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike DeMarco
Buffalo State · 2001-02
1.240 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Kris Heeres
SUNY Geneseo · 2000-01
1.042 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.