IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Blake Robertson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-03-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Bay State Breakers USPHL-Premier-Classic 39 0 3 3 0.077 0.0231 0.0242 0.0633 0.0664
2015-16 Springfield Jr. Pics USPHL-Premier-Classic 43 2 7 9 0.209 0.0629 0.0629 — —
2016-17 — USPHL-Premier-Classic 43 1 12 13 0.302 0.0908 0.0863 0.2490 0.2367
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Trine D3 NCHA SR 13 1 2 3 0.231
2019-20 Trine D3 NCHA JR 28 3 8 11 0.393
2018-19 Trine D3 NCHA SO 25 11 4 15 0.600
2017-18 Trine D3 NCHA FR 25 1 8 9 0.360
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2017-18 · Trine
+395.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17873
Defenseman overall
#2208
Defenseman born in 1996
#297
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Steven Zappia
Utica · 2009-10
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Parks
SUNY Brockport · 2012-13
0.474 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Samir Abouelhana
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2018-19
0.111 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.