| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-15 | Edina High | USHS-MN | 25 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 0.480 | 0.0608 | 0.0654 | 0.1166 | 0.1254 |
| 2015-16 | Fargo Force | USHL | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2016-17 | Fargo Force | USHL | 56 | 7 | 13 | 20 | 0.357 | 0.2107 | 0.2258 | 1.0725 | 1.1495 |
| 2017-18 | — | USHL | 16 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 0.750 | 0.4424 | 0.4522 | 2.2526 | 2.3024 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | Penn State | D1 | BigTen | GR | 32 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 0.375 |
| 2020-21 | Penn State | D1 | BigTen | SR | 20 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 0.350 |
| 2019-20 | Penn State | D1 | BigTen | JR | 27 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 0.333 |
| 2018-19 | Minnesota | D1 | BigTen | SO | 34 | 1 | 9 | 10 | 0.294 |
| 2017-18 | Minnesota | D1 | BigTen | FR | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.