← New Search ↗ Social Card

Clayton Phillips Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-09-09 Country: USA
2017 · Round 3, Pick #93  ·  Pittsburgh Penguins Pittsburgh Penguins
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Edina High USHS-MN 25 4 8 12 0.480 0.0608 0.0654 0.1166 0.1254
2015-16 Fargo Force USHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Fargo Force USHL 56 7 13 20 0.357 0.2107 0.2258 1.0725 1.1495
2017-18 USHL 16 5 7 12 0.750 0.4424 0.4522 2.2526 2.3024
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Penn State D1 BigTen GR 32 5 7 12 0.375
2020-21 Penn State D1 BigTen SR 20 3 4 7 0.350
2019-20 Penn State D1 BigTen JR 27 2 7 9 0.333
2018-19 Minnesota D1 BigTen SO 34 1 9 10 0.294
2017-18 Minnesota D1 BigTen FR 11 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

82%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3060
Defenseman overall
#721
Defenseman born in 1999

D1 Comparables

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Denver (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.64 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.95 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wilkes · 2016-17
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2016-17
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2016-17
1.423 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.