← New Search ↗ Social Card

Scooter Brickey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-05-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 10 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 USHL 56 7 14 21 0.375 0.2305 0.2437 1.1048 1.1682
2017-18 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 53 2 15 17 0.321 0.1972 0.1987 0.9451 0.9524
2018-19 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 62 8 21 29 0.468 0.2875 0.2749 1.3779 1.3175
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Ohio State D1 BigTen 37 13 13 26 0.703
2022-23 Ohio State D1 BigTen 40 3 11 14 0.350
2021-22 Western Michigan D1 NCHC JR 10 1 0 1 0.100
2020-21 Western Michigan D1 NCHC SO 25 2 4 6 0.240
2019-20 Western Michigan D1 NCHC FR 24 0 3 3 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2019-20 · Western Michigan
-45.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

70%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4516
Defenseman overall
#1064
Defenseman born in 1999
#2166
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2001-02
0.966 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Dartmouth · 2018-19
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2007-08
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.