IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Linus Weissbach Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-04-19 Country: Sweden
2017 · Round 7, Pick #192  ·  Buffalo Sabres Buffalo Sabres
Signed Professionally
Frölunda HC · SHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Frölunda HC U20 SuperElit 16 2 4 6 0.375 0.1480 0.1619 0.5093 0.5570
2015-16 Frölunda HC U20 SuperElit 44 17 31 48 1.091 0.4305 0.4520 1.4816 1.5557
2016-17 Tri-City Storm USHL 49 19 28 47 0.959 0.5658 0.5671 2.8809 2.8873
2024-25 Frölunda HC SHL 47 12 20 32 0.681 1.7022 1.7093 8.8848 8.9221
2025-26 Frölunda HC SHL 33 5 12 17 0.515 1.2880 1.2880 6.7226 6.7226
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Wisconsin D1 BigTen SR 31 12 29 41 1.323
2019-20 Wisconsin D1 BigTen JR 35 4 18 22 0.629
2018-19 Wisconsin D1 BigTen SO 27 8 17 25 0.926
2017-18 Wisconsin D1 BigTen FR 34 10 16 26 0.765
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.49
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.76
2017-18 · Wisconsin
+57.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Vinni Lettieri
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 2.00 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
1.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Filimon Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.