← New Search ↗ Social Card

T.J. Walsh Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-04-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 47 8 8 16 0.340 0.2008 0.2216 1.0224 1.1284
2017-18 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 32 2 6 8 0.250 0.1475 0.1555 0.7509 0.7915
2018-19 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 53 17 32 49 0.924 0.5454 0.5467 2.7766 2.7833
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Sacred Heart D1 AHA 36 13 13 26 0.722
2022-23 RPI D1 ECAC 35 7 10 17 0.486
2021-22 RPI D1 ECAC 36 4 15 19 0.528
2020-21 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast 15 0 3 3 0.200
2019-20 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast 20 2 3 5 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2019-20 · Northeastern
-25.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

98%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11837
Forward overall
#498
Forward born in 2000
#1086
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.81 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ UMass
0.55 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2017-18
1.667 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2023-24
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2017-18
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.