← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ronnie Attard Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-03-20 Country: USA
2019 NHL Draft Round 3, Pick #72  ·  Philadelphia Flyers Philadelphia Flyers
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 USHL 46 3 2 5 0.109 0.0668 0.0700 0.3203 0.3357
2017-18 USHL 50 8 7 15 0.300 0.1844 0.1841 0.8839 0.8825
2018-19 USHL 48 30 34 64 1.333 0.8196 0.7760 3.9282 3.7193
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Michigan D1 BigTen 39 13 23 36 0.923
2021-22 Western Michigan D1 NCHC 39 13 23 36 0.923
2020-21 Western Michigan D1 NCHC SO 25 8 14 22 0.880
2019-20 Western Michigan D1 NCHC FR 30 6 8 14 0.467
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.55
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.47
2019-20 · Western Michigan
-15.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 21 comparables)

⭐ Elite profile — high probability of D1 placement; comparable to top-end prospects
67%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
19%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.