IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kaleigh Schrock Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-10-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Toledo IceDiggers NAHL 51 15 8 23 0.451 0.1657 0.1570 0.4767 0.4516
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Neumann D3 MAC SR 26 4 4 8 0.308
2007-08 Neumann D3 MAC JR 26 2 4 6 0.231
2006-07 Neumann D3 MAC SO 19 3 2 5 0.263
2005-06 Neumann D3 MAC FR 22 3 5 8 0.364
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2005-06 · Neumann
+170.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#31824
Forward overall
#909
Forward born in 1984
#2973
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Charlie Zuccarini
Trinity · 2014-15
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
William Lawrence
Connecticut College · 2023-24
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Todd Jackson
Norwich · 2015-16
0.379 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.