IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Conway Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-03-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Springfield Spirit NAHL 49 6 5 11 0.225 0.0797 0.0773 0.2357 0.2286
2005-06 — NAHL 58 4 9 13 0.224 0.0796 0.0732 0.2353 0.2165
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 St. Thomas D3 — FR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2008-09 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 — JR 4 0 0 0 0.000
2007-08 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 — SO 24 4 2 6 0.250
2006-07 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 — FR 9 1 1 2 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2006-07 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+246.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#49027
Forward overall
#1514
Forward born in 1985
#5600
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Steve Sankey
SUNY Geneseo · 2003-04
0.379 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Muzyka
Skidmore · 2016-17
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Zakrzewski
SUNY Cortland · 2024-25
0.524 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.