IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Graham Sisson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-06-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Texarkana Bandits NAHL 57 9 15 24 0.421 0.1547 0.1593 0.4445 0.4578
2006-07 St. Louis Bandits NAHL 62 26 38 64 1.032 0.3793 0.3720 1.0896 1.0686
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC — 23 5 11 16 0.696
2010-11 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC — 19 1 9 10 0.526
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.53
2010-11 · Bowdoin
+114.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14822
Forward overall
#513
Forward born in 1987
#686
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Jay Dickman
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.36 No data
NCAAe PPG
John Simonson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brett Skibba
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Garret Clemment
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
Robbie Payne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brody Simko
Trine · 2023-24
1.214 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Morton
Curry · 2023-24
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Shane Wheeler
St. Norbert · 2005-06
0.903 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.