IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Josh Kamrass Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-09-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Helena Bighorns NAHL 45 8 15 23 0.511 0.1878 0.1960 0.5395 0.5631
2006-07 Santa Fe Roadrunners NAHL 60 19 34 53 0.883 0.3245 0.3227 0.9323 0.9272
2007-08 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 53 23 45 68 1.283 0.4714 0.4456 1.3542 1.2802
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Curry D3 CNE — 6 0 8 8 1.333
2010-11 Curry D3 CNE — 8 3 3 6 0.750
2009-10 Curry D3 CNE — 19 5 8 13 0.684
2008-09 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen — 13 0 1 1 0.077
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.34
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2008-09 · Wisconsin-River Falls
-77.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9512
Forward overall
#341
Forward born in 1987
#220
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.48 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jack Billings
Salve Regina · 2015-16
1.381 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Bickley
Wisconsin-Superior · 2001-02
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Kowin Belsterling
Chatham · 2024-25
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.