IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jesse Junkermeier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-03-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Southern Minnesota Express NAHL 51 3 8 11 0.216 0.0766 0.0781 0.2275 0.2321
2006-07 Southern Minnesota Express NAHL 60 21 20 41 0.683 0.2428 0.2357 0.7207 0.6997
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SR 24 2 4 6 0.250
2009-10 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC JR 27 5 10 15 0.556
2008-09 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SO 21 1 6 7 0.333
2007-08 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC FR 7 2 1 3 0.429
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2007-08 · Wisconsin-Superior
+190.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#29135
Forward overall
#941
Forward born in 1987
#2526
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Evan Janssen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eric Freschi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Devin Loe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Miami (0.71 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Vincent Paquette
Adrian · 2014-15
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Mueller
Fredonia · 2007-08
0.842 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Caprio
Becker · 2005-06
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.