IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Caprio Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-05-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Northern Michigan Black Bears NOJHL 48 16 25 41 0.854 0.1440 0.1412 0.3549 0.3479
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Becker D3 — SR 21 4 2 6 0.286
2008-09 Becker D3 — JR 23 6 11 17 0.739
2007-08 Becker D3 — SO 26 4 13 17 0.654
2006-07 Becker D3 — FR 22 9 9 18 0.818
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.82
2006-07 · Becker
+576.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#28724
Forward overall
#1064
Forward born in 1986
#271
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

Mike Robinson
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ New Hampshire
0.11 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Robin Höglund
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trevor Cear
UMass Dartmouth · 2018-19
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Gregg Amato
SUNY Brockport · 2006-07
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Joseph Nikac
SUNY Brockport · 2022-23
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.