IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gregg Amato Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1987-05-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Cobourg Cougars OJHL 23 7 2 9 0.391 0.1093 0.1098 0.2700 0.2713
2006-07 Cobourg Cougars OJHL 49 3 28 31 0.633 0.1768 0.1688 0.4366 0.4168
2007-08 Port Hope Predators OJHL 49 4 20 24 0.490 0.1369 0.1245 0.3380 0.3073
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 SUNY Brockport D3 — SR 18 0 1 1 0.056
2010-11 SUNY Brockport D3 — JR 24 0 4 4 0.167
2009-10 SUNY Brockport D3 — SO 22 3 15 18 0.818
2008-09 SUNY Brockport D3 — FR 27 2 13 15 0.556
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2008-09 · SUNY Brockport
+313.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7619
Defenseman overall
#1112
Defenseman born in 1987
#2538
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jérémy Carignan
Saint Anselm · 2014-15
0.455 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Travis Brown
Saint John's · 2016-17
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Joe Anderson
Wisconsin-Stout · 2014-15
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.