IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jérémy Carignan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-05-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Kanata Stallions CCHL 58 4 23 27 0.466 0.1010 0.0976 0.3602 0.3480
2014-15 Express Hockey Club EHL 34 8 15 23 0.676 0.1563 0.1478 0.3310 0.3129
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 SR 26 4 3 7 0.269
2017-18 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 JR 23 7 10 17 0.739
2016-17 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 SO 24 8 10 18 0.750
2015-16 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 FR 22 3 7 10 0.455
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.45
2015-16 · Saint Anselm
+315.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#28380
Forward overall
#1092
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hayden Ford
Buffalo State · 2017-18
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Brenton
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2010-11
0.353 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Declan House
Franklin Pierce · 2021-22
0.467 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.