← New Search ↗ Social Card

Vito Carlo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-05-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Atlanta Capitals NA3HL 26 3 9 12 0.462 0.0579 0.0595 0.1457 0.1498
2017-18 Atlanta Capitals NA3HL 46 8 35 43 0.935 0.1173 0.1146 0.2951 0.2884
2018-19 Atlanta Capitals NA3HL 47 7 36 43 0.915 0.1148 0.1061 0.2888 0.2670
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 32 5 6 11 0.344
2021-22 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 26 3 8 11 0.423
2020-21 Franklin Pierce D1 NE10 SO 6 1 1 2 0.333
2020-21 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 6 1 1 2 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2020-21 · Franklin Pierce
+222.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7585
Defenseman overall
#1494
Defenseman born in 1998
#1077
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Middlebury · 2024-25
0.423 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Albertus Magnus · 2024-25
0.471 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2010-11
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.