IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bradley Marek Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-11-13 Country: USA
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 — USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2017-18 — USHL 32 8 4 12 0.375 0.2212 0.2391 1.1263 1.2177
2018-19 — USHL 62 11 7 18 0.290 0.1712 0.1763 0.8719 0.8976
2019-20 — USHL 47 3 5 8 0.170 0.1004 0.1004 0.5112 0.5112
2020-21 — USHL 48 15 12 27 0.562 0.3318 0.3318 1.6894 1.6894
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Ferris State D1 CCHA — 36 7 10 17 0.472
2021-22 Ferris State D1 CCHA — 36 10 9 19 0.528
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.53
2021-22 · Ferris State
+206.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Gaudreau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jake Horton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bo Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cédric Lacroix
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hunter Stewart
Marian · 2011-12
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyson Gilmour
SUNY Geneseo · 2016-17
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Marc Rubino
Lake Forest · 2008-09
0.913 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.