IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kent Detlefsen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1987-08-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 — NAHL 37 9 9 18 0.486 0.1806 0.1792 0.5151 0.5110
2007-08 — NAHL 54 25 24 49 0.907 0.3369 0.3177 0.9608 0.9060
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 — SR 23 2 7 9 0.391
2010-11 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 — JR 20 1 7 8 0.400
2009-10 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 — SO 14 3 7 10 0.714
2008-09 Wisconsin-Superior D3 — FR 29 6 7 13 0.448
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.45
2008-09 · Wisconsin-Superior
+81.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#1907
Defenseman overall
#530
Defenseman born in 1987
#752
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Zink
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Paul LaDue
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Casey Nelson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alex Storjohann
SUNY Cortland · 2016-17
0.565 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeff Olitch
Wentworth · 2005-06
1.143 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Paul Boutoussov
Salve Regina · 2016-17
0.724 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.