IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kent Detlefsen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1987-08-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 — NAHL 37 9 9 18 0.486 0.1787 0.1773 0.5135 0.5094
2007-08 — NAHL 54 25 24 49 0.907 0.3334 0.3144 0.9578 0.9031
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC SR 23 2 7 9 0.391
2010-11 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC JR 20 1 7 8 0.400
2009-10 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC SO 14 3 7 10 0.714
2008-09 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC FR 29 6 7 13 0.448
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.45
2008-09 · Wisconsin-Superior
+83.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3321
Defenseman overall
#568
Defenseman born in 1987
#877
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Paul LaDue
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alex Storjohann
SUNY Cortland · 2016-17
0.565 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alexei Filimonov
Fitchburg State · 2024-25
1.560 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Romano
SUNY Geneseo · 2015-16
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.