| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-07 | Springfield Jr. Blues | NAHL | 55 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 0.291 | 0.1069 | 0.1078 | 0.3070 | 0.3097 |
| 2007-08 | Springfield Jr. Blues | NAHL | 57 | 12 | 10 | 22 | 0.386 | 0.1418 | 0.1361 | 0.4074 | 0.3909 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-09 | Wisconsin-River Falls | D3 | BigTen | FR | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.