← New Search ↗ Social Card

Grant Hebert Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-05-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 — CCHL 4 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2015-16 Navan Grads CCHL 53 17 24 41 0.774 0.1678 0.1716 0.5926 0.6062
2016-17 Navan Grads CCHL 60 27 64 91 1.517 0.3290 0.3193 1.1618 1.1274
2017-18 Fargo Force USHL 57 15 39 54 0.947 0.5589 0.5070 2.8429 2.5790
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Maine D1 HockeyEast — 8 1 2 3 0.375
2021-22 Maine D1 HockeyEast — 29 7 9 16 0.552
2020-21 Robert Morris D1 AHA JR 24 8 15 23 0.958
2019-20 Robert Morris D1 AHA SO 17 5 7 12 0.706
2018-19 Robert Morris D1 AHA FR 33 5 5 10 0.303
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.37
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2018-19 · Robert Morris
-18.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

75%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6559
Forward overall
#320
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aurora · 2013-14
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2021-22
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2023-24
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.